Antibiotics
As predicted last year, we have indeed been blitzed with a
promotional overdose of “fourth generation” antibiotics. We
wonder if the discovery of penicillin was as highly touted!
These new antibiotics do, however, perform beautifully, just
like their predecessors.

Fluoroquinolones
- Ciloxan (ciprofloxacin 0.3%, Alcon)
- Iquix (levofloxacin
1.5%, Vistakon Pharmaceuticals)
- Ocuflox (ofloxacin 0.3%, Allergan)
- Quixin (levofloxacin 0.5%, Vistakon Pharmaceuticals)
- Vigamox
(moxifloxacin 0.5%, Alcon)
- Zymar (gatifloxacin 0.3%, Allergan)
The only “new” antibiotic approved since last year is asuperchargedconcentration
of levofloxacin 1.5% ophthalmicsolution, Iquix
(Vistakon Pharmaceuticals).
We areall familiar with Quixin, Vistakon Pharmaceuticals’
0.5% levofloxacin; Iquix will be the new big kid on the block
once it becomes available. (Vistakon is still unsure of a launch
date.) Levofloxacin, by virtue of its high solubility, can
be relatively highly concentrated, thus allowing a 1.5% solution.
Unique to all the newer fluoroquinolones, it enjoys an FDA
indication for bacterial keratitis.
As with any of the fluoroquinolones, the key to a clinical
cure of bacterial infection is to reach and maintain a high
inhibitory concentration at the infection site. This is accomplished
by frequent dosing, and we truly doubt it makes any difference
which of the fluoroquinolones you choose to use. To wit, it
would be interesting to see the change (or lack thereof) in
the incidence of postoperative infection with the widespread
use of these newer antibiotics.
A very nice article looked at the antibiotic susceptibility
patterns of coagulase-negative staphylococcus bacteria.1 It
found that the greatest sensitivities were “to vancomycin,
the aminoglycosides (except neomycin), and levofloxacin.” Unfortunately,
moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin, and 1.5% levofloxacin were not
available at the time this study was initiated; undoubtedly,
these three would have performed at least as well. When this
study looked at a multi-resistant bacteria, the aminoglycosides
outperformed even the fluoroquinolones, and were 95% as effective
as vancomycin, the gold standard in treating gram-positive
pathogens.
Another article discussing in vitro antibacterial activity—which
compared gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin with levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin
and ofloxacin against isolates of bacteria known to cause corneal
infection—reported that “for most keratitis isolates, there
were no susceptibility differences among the five fluoroquinolones.”2
The authors also say, “Minor differences in minimal inhibitory
concentrations among fluoroquinolones may be less important
clinically, however, as long as effective antibiotic tissue
concentrations remain high.” This is best accomplished via
frequent dosing schedules with higher concentrations of fluoroquinolone.
The authors go on the state, “the actual clinical efficacy
of the newer fluoroquinolones remains to be defined by the
results of clinical trials for the treatment of bacterial keratitis
and conjunctivitis.” The salient points from these two recent
articles nicely summarize the key elements of the topical fluoroquinolones.
Bear
in mind that all the ophthalmic fluoroquinolones have systemic
counterparts. These orally administered drugs have been more
rigorously studied and have been in clinical use longer than
their ophthalmic offspring. Whatever these drugs do systemically,
they do even better when they are topically applied. Since
the efficacy of the fluoroquinolones is largely concentration-dependent,
and we can place enormously greater drug per unit volume on
the ocular surface than a can a pill distributed throughout
the entire body, it is usually a simple task to kill ocular
bacterial pathogens.
- levofloxacin (Levaquin, Ortho- McNeil). .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41%
- ciprofloxacin (Cipro, Bayer)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . 39%
- Moxifloxacin (Avelox, Bayer) . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11%
- gatifloxacin (Tequin, Bristol-Myers Squibb . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8%
- ofloxacin (Floxin, Daiichi Pharmaceutical) . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1%
|
Although our sources were unable to get us the exact numbers
for 2004, they conveyed that (as of June 2004) the percent
national market share of oral fluoroquinolones in first quarter
2004 was very similar to the same period a year previously,
no more than 2 percentage points higher or lower. Their popularity
rank was in the same order: levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin,
gatifloxacin, ofloxacin. Two conclusions that can be drawn
from this are that the “real” doctors just don’t get it, or
the eye doctors are being very heavily marketed. The nice thing
is, all of the fluoroquinolones work well when used properly.
Pick one and go for it!
The two most hyped ophthalmic fluoroquinolones are moxifloxacin
(Vigamox, Alcon) and gatifloxacin (Zymar, Allergan). Of these
two fine drugs, we generally prefer moxifloxacin for three
reasons: its 0.5% concentration, its pH of 6.8, and it is self-preserved.
Gatifloxacin is 0.3%, has a pH of 6.0, and contains BAK as
a preservative.
The Bottom Line on Fluoroquinolone
Frequency
With so many different organisms and so many different
antibiotics to use, some eye doctors can get uncertain.
Although each case must be individualized, here’s the bottom
line:
When using any ophthalmic fluoroquinolone, use it aggressively
(q1-2 hours) for two to three days for moderate to severe
conjunctivitis.
For true bacterial keratitis (not sterile infiltrate!),
use a fluoroquinolone every 15 to 30 minutes for several
hours to saturate the corneal tissues, then hourly for
as many days as it takes to quiet the tissues (usually
three to four days). Have these patients concurrently
use Polysporin ointment for coverage during the sleep
cycle.
Once the infection is under control, decrease the frequency
of instillation from hourly to q2 hours for three to
four more days, then q.i.d. for three to six additional
days.
Never drop below q.i.d. unless you want to purposefully
create resistance. It is protracted sub-bactericidal
drug levels that set the stage for resistance development. |
Aminoglycosides
- Gentamicin
- Tobramycin
- Neomycin
Aminoglycosides are less expensive than fluoroquinolones and
are effective for most “garden variety” cases of bacterial
conjunctivitis, making them our drug of choice for treating
most acute bacterial infections.
There are two notable aminoglycosides: gentamicin and tobramycin.
Because tobramycin ophthalmic solution is available in generic
form and is slightly more effective while slightly less toxic
than gentamicin, we invariably prescribe tobramycin when we
need an aminoglycoside. The third aminoglycoside, neomycin,
is not available as a stand-alone drug, but is found in certain
combination drugs such as Neosporin, Maxitrol, etc.
Aminoglycosides work by inhibiting protein synthesis. They’re
most effective against gram-negative bacteria, especially Pseudomonas
species, but are also effective against most gram-positive bacteria.
Though aminoglycoside toxicity is legendary—clinical signs include
epithelial breakdown (SPK), injection in the inferior cul-de-sac,
and a weepy erythema and edema of the eyelid tissues—these responses
are usually not serious and mostly occur after the drug is used
in excess of a week or two. In our years of clinical practice,
we have never seen such an occurrence. For short-term use, these
drugs are excellent cost-effective choices for killing bacterial
ocular pathogens. Rarely are they used long enough to produce
any significant side effects, unless the patient is pre-sensitized.
Tobramycin and gentamicin are available in solution (0.3%) and
ointment (0.3%) form, but generally should not be used beyond
one week because of their toxic potential.
Being aminoglycosides, they can cause allergic reactions similar
to those seen with neomycin, but are less likely to do so. When
bactericidal therapy is needed in ointment form, Polysporin is
our choice.
Erythromycin
Erythromycin, which is only available in ophthalmic ointment form, is our drug
of choice for pressure patching corneal abrasions and for nocturnal antibiosis/lubrication.
It is gentle on the cornea and provides good antibacterial prophylaxis. It is
a wonderful drug that is available generically and is used extensively in primary
eye care of the external eye tissues.
Erythromycin, which is bacteriostatic, works by inhibiting protein synthesis.
The topical form of this drug is effective against many gram-positive and some
gram-negative organisms. If used over several days, staphylococcal resistance
may develop. The drug is only available as a 0.5% ointment. For these reasons
erythromycin is not a drug of choice for active therapy, but is an excellent
prophylactic and supportive antibiotic.
Erythromycin is commonly used in labor and delivery suites as a second-line therapy
to tetracycline ophthalmic ointment for neonatal prophylaxis against Neisseria,
Treponemia and Chlamydia ocular inoculation during birth process. Topical erythromycin
is commonly known by the brand name Ilotycin by Dista, and from Bausch & Lomb
as an 0.125 oz. conventional ophthalmic tube and a 1gm unit-dose tube. Erythromycin
ophthalmic ointment is widely available from numerous other generic manufacturers.
The Research Literature on Fluoroquinolones
Following are select quotes (or in-context paraphrases)
from two excellent articles, published earlier this
year, on fourth generation fluoroquinolones. The
articles bring up the following points:
- The true clinical performance (not systemically-related
in vitro testing) of newer fluoroquinolones is not
yet fully established. We long for independent clinical
studies to show us the practical reality of the various
drugs.
- Using any of the three newer fluoroquinolones—and
an upcoming fourth new drug, Vistakon’s Iquix, levofloxacin
1.5%—frequently (e.g., q1-2 hrs for a day or two) should
reach high enough concentrations to kill most all bacterial
pathogens. After a couple of days, the frequency of
instillations can be tapered down to q.i.d. based upon
the clinical response.
- Perhaps we should rely more on generic tobramycin
for garden-variety infections and honor the strategy
of resistance prevention by “avoiding indiscriminate
use” of the newer fluoroquinolones.
Select Quotes:
- Blondeau JM. Fluoroquinolones: mechanism of action,
classification, and development of resistance. Surv
Ophthalmol 2004 Mar;49 Suppl 2:S73-8. Review.
- “Fluoroquinolones act by inhibiting two enzymes involved
in bacterial DNA synthesis, both of which are DNA topoisomerases
that human cells lack and that are essential for bacterial
DNA replication.”
“Although some degree of overlap may exist, DNA gyrase
tends to be the primary target for fluoroquinolones
in gram-negative organisms where topoisomerase IV is
typically the primary target in gram-positive bacteria.”
- Hwang DG. Fluoroquinolone resistance in ophthalmology
and the potential role for newer ophthalmic fluoroquinolones.
Surv Ophthalmol 2004 Mar;49 Suppl 2:S79-83. Review.
“The clinical benefits of these newer fluoroquinolones
have yet to be fully established, but their attributes
suggest a potential role in addressing at least one
emerging and important problem in ocular infectious
disease: the observation of a rising incidence of fluoroquinolone
resistance amongst bacterial ocular isolates.”
“Low-level in vitro resistance may not necessarily
translate into a clinical treatment failure since the
tissue levels that can be achieved with topical dosing
may be much higher than that typically achieved after
systemic dosing.”
“Resistance is more likely to arise after exposure
of a bacterial subpopulation to repeated rounds of
sub-lethal doses of fluoroquinolone.”
“Recent studies have suggested that by maintaining
a fluoroquinolone concentration above a certain level,
termed the mutant prevention concentration (MPC), the
probability of selecting for a single-step mutant can
be greatly reduced. For fluoroquinolones, the MPC is
generally several-fold above the MIC. Thus, the probability
of selecting a single-step resistant mutant can be
lowered by maintaining the highest possible ratio between
tissue fluoroquinolone concentration and the MIC, preferably
at a level equal to or exceeding the MPC. A higher
tissue fluoroquinolone concentration can be achieved
in a number of ways, including dosing at more frequent
intervals, increasing the concentration of the drug
in the ophthalmic formulation, using adjunctive drug
delivery devices in remission penetration enhancers,
or employing fluoroquinolones with enhanced ocular
penetration characteristics. The MIC can be lowered
by utilizing a fluoroquinolone with heightened activity
against the bacterial species of interest.
“All three of the newer fluoroquinolones possess characteristics
that are conducive to maximizing the tissue concentration
relative to the MIC, and thus have a lower theoretical
likelihood of encouraging the development of resistance,
assuming the fluoroquinolone is properly used and dosed.
“[Gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin] are still susceptible
to resistance due to one or more mutations in other
genes (a not infrequent event) or due to a double mutation
in both topoisomerase II (DNA gyrase) and topoisomerase
IV (a highly improbable event).”
“Newer fluoroquinolones such as levofloxacin and in
particular the 8-methoxyfluoroquinolones gatifloxacin
and moxifloxacin offer the opportunity to help address
[declining efficacy of older fluoroquinolones] in two
ways. First, their enhanced activity against Gram-positive
pathogens increases the probability that the strains
resistant to an older fluoroquinolone will be susceptible
to one of the newer fluoroquinolones. Second, they
are less prone to encouraging the development of resistance
on a number of fronts, primarily because of their higher
activity against gram-positive pathogens, but also
for other reasons (higher concentration in the case
of levofloxacin; resistance to single-step topoisomerase
mutations in the case of gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin).
Primary use of newer fluoroquinolones in preference
to initial use of older fluoroquinolones offers a potential
strategy for helping to forestall the development of
resistance, but this approach must be coupled with
the overall strategy of avoiding indiscriminate use
and ensuring proper dosing of these antimicrobials.
|
Bacitracin
Bacitracin ophthalmic ointment is our drug of choice for treating
bacterial blepharitis. The drug, which breaks down cell walls,
works well against staphylococcal bacteria, the main bacterial
cause of blepharitis and the most common ocular pathogen. If there is clinically significant lid margin inflammation
concurrent with the staph. blepharitis, then a one-week course
of TobraDex is better initial medical therapy.
Its effectiveness and minimal toxicity would make bacitracin
a drug of choice for treating gram-positive infections, except
that it is only available as an ophthalmic ointment. Even so,
bacitracin can sometimes be very difficult to find, so we tend
to prescribe Polysporin (the polymyxin B is just inertly “along
for the ride”).
Also keep in mind that the mainstay of therapy for blepharitis
is meticulous long-term eyelid hygiene. But a short course
of bacitracin in chronic staphylococcal blepharitis would augment
the hygienic maneuvers and hasten the recovery process. Its
singular practical use, in our opinion, is in these select
cases of moderate to severe staphylococcal blepharitis. It
is available from Bausch & Lomb and other generic manufacturers.
Polymyxin B Combinations
Many drugs are relatively “broad-spectrum” yet do not adequately
cover Pseudomonas and other gram-negative species. As bacitracin
is effective against gram positive organisms, polymyxin B
is a potent killer of gram negative bacteria, including Pseudomonas.
Resistance, toxicity and allergic reactions are rare. It
works by destroying the cell membrane’s structural and functional
integrity, resulting in cell death. For this reason, polymyxin
B is commonly found in the following combination products.
• Polytrim ophthalmic solution (Allergan). Trimethoprim, a
diaminopyrimidine, achieves bacteriostasis by interfering with
folic acid synthesis. Specifically, it interrupts the synthesis
of tetrahydrofolic acid, the metabolically usable form of folic
acid. Trimethoprim is active against most common gram-positive
and gram-negative ocular pathogens, except Pseudomonas species.
Trimethoprim sulfate (0.1%) with polymyxin B is marketed as
Polytrim ophthalmic solution by Allergan, and available generically.
This combination product is an excellent antibiotic for treating
bacterial conjunctivitis in children and adults. Untoward side
effects are very rare. It is clinically effective against most
common ocular pathogens, and is minimally toxic to the eye.
It has a high clinical efficacy against Haemophilus influenzae
and Streptococcus pneumoniae, the most common causes of bacterial
eye infections in children, making it our drug of choice in
these cases. To wit, pediatricians are the largest prescribers
of Polytrim.
It isn’t available in ointment form, and may not be suitable
for smaller children in whom drop instillation is physically
impossible or crying washes out the drops. In those cases,
you could substitute Polysporin or Ciloxan ophthalmic ointment;
both have good coverage against Haemophilus and Streptococcus
species.
Interestingly, it has been reported that “H. influenzae type-B
is now nearly non-existent as a pathogen in childhood epiglottis,
meningitis, buccal cellulitis, and otitis.”4 This may well
be valid for conjunctivitis as well. It does appear that most
infections tend to be strep and staph. Therefore, good coverage
against gram-positive organisms is essential.
The recommended frequency of administration is one drop every
three hours (q3h) while awake. This is a bit more frequent
than the more common four times-a-day schedule. As with most
other anti-bacterial agents, treatment should continue for
a full week.
• Polysporin (Monarch Pharmaceuticals). This is an excellent
broad-spectrum antibiotic combination that enjoys widespread
use in eye care. The combination of bacitracin and polymyxin
B is excellent for two reasons:
1. It is highly efficacious against most of the common ocular
pathogens, both gram positive and gram negative.
2. It is relatively non-toxic to global epithelial tissues.
It can play a role in any bacterial infectious process, but
it is only available in ointment form, which limits its practical
use.
We discourage use of ointments in adults for daytime therapy
because it is not very patient-friendly. But if there is an
indication for using an effective antibiotic at nighttime to
get around-the-clock antibacterial coverage, certainly Polysporin
(or Ciloxan) would be an excellent choice. In the event of
a “dirty” corneal abrasion, such as a scratch by a dirty piece
of metal, then it might be preferable to use Polysporin (or
Ciloxan) instead of erythromycin. However, these are relatively
rare occurrences.
Doctors can prescribe this drug safely in most bacterial infections.
In blepharitis therapy, since polymyxin B is non-toxic, Polysporin
can be substituted for bacitracin should the pharmacy not have
bacitracin. Ciloxan ointment could also be used for infectious
blepharitis.
• Neosporin (Monarch Pharmaceuticals). Bacitracin (or gramicidin)
with polymyxin B and neomycin is available as Neosporin as
a solution and an ointment. In the solution, gramicidin replaces
bacitracin, since bacitracin is unstable in water. In terms
of activity, gramicidin is virtually identical to bacitracin
but more water-soluble.
The addition of neomycin, an aminoglycoside, kills a broad
spectrum of bacteria by inhibiting protein synthesis. It’s
effective against most gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria,
with the notable exception of Pseudomonas.
We rarely use it, however, because of the possibility of neomycin
reactions, although they are uncommon. About 5% of all patients
will experience a delayed, type IV hypersensitivity reaction
to neomycin. If the patient has not been exposed to the drug
before, the reaction can occur after several days of therapy.
If the patient has been previously sensitized, the reaction
can happen more quickly, usually within 12 to 72 hours.
If such a classic neomycin hypersensitivity were to occur,
you will usually see erythema and mild edema of the eyelids,
conjunctival injection, and possibly superficial punctate keratitis.
The reaction usually is most pronounced in the inferonasal
region of the eye because gravity and blink mechanics carry
the drug there. The primary therapy is to discontinue the drug.
The reaction typically resolves on its own within a few days.
Consider recommending cold compresses and/or a topical steroid
ointment such as FML, or a combination ophthalmic ointment
containing 10% sodium sulfacetamide and either 0.2 or 0.25%
prednisolone (Blephamide, Isopto-cetapred) or 0.5% prednisolone
(Metimyd or Vasocidin), applied to the inflamed tissues once
or twice during the day and then at bedtime. The antibacterial
agent plays no role here; the only way to obtain low concentrations
of prednisolone in ointment form is in such combination products.
Triamcinolone 0.1% dermatological cream has become our favorite
for treating all expressions of delayed (Type IV) hypersensitivity
contact dermatitis.
Because newer antibiotics are now available that are less
toxic and equally or superiorly efficacious, there is little
reason to use products containing neomycin. Clinicians have
other options that work just as well without the unnecessary
risk of annoying neomycin side effects.
Pearls to Remember When Treating
Infections
• The vast majority of ocular surface infections
resolve with your antibiotic drug of choice used four
times a day for about a week. We generally treat more
moderate to severe infections q2h for one to two days,
then q.i.d. for five to six more days.
• If the infection is more severe and needs more intensive
treatment, use the drug every hour or two for a few
days until you have gained control, then reduce dosage
frequency to four times a day for one more week.
• Only in rare, severe bacterial infections or in
bacterial keratitis would we add an antibiotic ointment
at bedtime.
• When treating bacterial infections, if there is
no improvement in two to three days, suspect non-compliance,
microbial resistance, subtherapeutic dosing frequency,
inappropriate choice of drug; or most likely, incorrect
diagnosis.
• Having patients gently close their eyelids for a
minute or two following instillation of any eye drop
greatly enhances tissue penetration and can augment
the efficacy of the medication in more severe infections.
• Epidemiologically, plain bacterial eye infections
are relatively uncommon. Most “red eye” presentations
are primarily inflammatory in nature. If there is marked
inflammation associated with an infection, prescribing
a combination antibiotic-steroid is usually the best
therapeutic approach.
• Patients who present very early in the course of
the infection are often the most difficult to treat
because the nature of the condition is not readily
apparent. An option is to start out with artificial
tears for a day or two. During this time, the condition
will either improve or become more definitively diagnosable.
• Any anti-bacterial drug, with prolonged use, can
allow overgrowth of non-susceptible organisms, including
fungi. However, the vast majority of primary eye conditions,
when appropriately treated, respond in less than a
week. It would be uncommon for therapy to be indicated
beyond 7-10 days.
• When delayed hypersensitivity reactions to topical
drugs do occur (like neomycin and gentamicin) they
usually do not cause signs and symptoms until about
5-10 days of treatment in patients previously unexposed
to these agents. If the patient is already sensitized
due to prior exposure, this response can occur more
quickly, usually within 12-72 hours.
• Common gram-positive organisms causing ocular disease
are: Staphylococcus (aureus and epidermis) and Streptococcus
pneumoniae. Gram-negatives are: Pseudomonas, Haemophilus
influenzae, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Moraxella lacunata,
Proteus vulgaris and Serratia marcescens.
|
Click here for Topical Antibiotic Drugs |