Eye Update
sub1

 





sub2 sub3

Excerpts From: The International Glaucoma Review, Volume 10-3, 2008

Imaging Technology in Glaucoma
Today we have several instruments that provide objective and quantitative measurements that are highly reproducible and show very good agreement with clinical estimates of optic disc and visual function. Yet, many clinicians continue to wonder how to use these in their clinical practices and clinical trials. Now, more than ever, it seems to be an appropriate time to assess the use of imaging in clinical practice.

Optic nerve head photography, particularly stereoscopic, provides a permanent record, but generally is not used because it is impractical and cameras generally are not available. Moreover, the differences among clinicians in their interpretation of photographs, either for diagnosis or progression, are remarkably large.

Given the substantial advances in glaucoma imaging, it is important to remind clinicians that current glaucoma diagnosis cannot be solely instrument-based. Rather, the imaging information should be considered as being complementary to other clinical measures. Nevertheless, given the variability of drawings and subjective photographic interpretation, imaging may elevate the assessment of the optic nerve by the general clinician, perhaps to the level of a fellowship-trained glaucoma specialist. Moreover, imaging enables the clinician to objectively evaluate the papillary RNFL (retina nerve fiber layer) that changes early in the course of the disease, which cannot be readily measured by clinical examination. Finally, imaging enables a practical comparison of a patient with a population of age-matched normals, facilitating the ability to identify abnormal structural features. Clinicians should not make clinical decisions based solely on the results of one single test or technology.

M & T:
This is wonderfully stated, and should be earnestly taken to heart by all clinicians!

Appropriate Use of Technology in Glaucoma Diagnosis
Clinicians should be cautious when using a single parameter, or a single technology, to facilitate glaucoma diagnosis. The range of normal optic disc topography and RNFL thickness values is large, and study results often vary across populations.


Glaucoma Management
Clinical assessment of the optic nerve is a cornerstone of managing patient with glaucoma, as well as those at risk for glaucoma. Glaucomatous optic discs can predict visual function loss. Careful clinical examination of the optic nerve structure is essential for accurate diagnosis of glaucoma.

Corneal Hysteresis
Corneal hysteresis is at present a manifestation of some aspect of the material properties of the cornea, but what those properties are remains unclear.

Swimming Goggles and IOP
A study found that IOP increased by a mean of 4.5mmHg while wearing swimming goggles, and this increase was sustained for the duration of goggle wear. The study provides useful practical information for at-risk glaucoma patients who wish to go swimming (and wear goggles).

Stratus OCT and RNFL Measurement in Myopes
Vernon et al. sound a note of caution in interpreting Stratus OCT results in highly myopic eyes. The retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) measures significantly thinner in high myopes than in eyes with less than six diopters of myopia, most prominently in the nasal clock hours.

Glaucoma Screening

  • Primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) accounts for approximately 25% of all glaucomatous optic neuropathy worldwide, but 50% of bilateral glaucoma blindness.

  • Some Asian populations have a high prevalence of advanced angle-closure glaucoma.

  • There is evidence that limbal anterior chamber depth (LCD) may be an appropriate screening test for angle closure.

  • Using a LCD of 25% corneal thickness as a cut-off, all those cases falling below this level would require gonioscopy. Approximately 4% of occludable angles may be missed by this method.

    M & T:
    Being that the glass is half full, this gives a 96% level of sensitivity without the extra time and effort of gonioscopy.

  • Screening of high-risk subgroups could be more cost-effective than screening the entire population.

ftr