EyeUpdate Home
Contact Us Sitemap hdr
hdr2 hdr3 hdr5
Clinical Pearls Case Studies Seminars / Lectures Books Links
sub1

 





sub2 sub3

Excerpts From:  The International Glaucoma Review, Volume 7-2, 2005:
World Glaucoma Congress 

(Third in a Series From This Publication)


Noteworthy Information  

  • All commonly employed methods of LTP appear to be equivalent with respect to short-term side effects and IOP lowering. 

  • There is no longer follow-up data available for argon laser trabeculoplasty (ALT) than for selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT). Randomized studies comparing these two modalities are not yet available.

M & T Commentary:
While SLT is generally hyped to be superior to ALT, it appears that either type of laser trabeculoplasty is equally effective.  Hopefully a prospective, randomized study will one day determine the winner of this (probably insignificant) horserace [debate?].

  • Six percent of patients with NTG have positive neuroimaging of compressive lesions; 60% of NTG progress despite 30% IOP lowering treatment.

  • Five dB loss with SAP equates to 25% RGC loss, 10 dB loss to 40% RGC loss, a paracentral scotoma with 5 dB loss equates to 50% RGC loss.

Structural Progression
Medeiros et al. report a group of patients with impending glaucoma who showed a change in the disc configuration over time, compared to another group with good ocular health who did not show change.  They found that about half of those with changed discs also had visual field defect, but the others did not. The GDx VCC scanning laser polarimetry was able to discriminate rather well those with emerging glaucoma (changing discs) from those who were healthy.

Two  conclusions are reached by the authors:  that GDx is able to pick up some cases of emerging glaucoma before field defects are recognized, and that a changing disc, even if not yet definitively abnormal, can be used as a sign of early glaucoma to validate any instrument’s ability to recognize early glaucoma.

The paper highlights that there are two ways to recognize glaucoma.  The first is the traditional approach to define ‘abnormality’ (disease) as being outside the bounds of findings in 95% of a healthy population - whether it be disc configuration, nerve fiber measurements, or visual field parameters.  The problem with any measurement has been that the range of normal overlaps that found in patients with early glaucoma, so that any cut-off point has false-positives and false-negatives.  One idea behind improved technology is to find some measurement that has less overlap between eyes with early glaucoma and those in perfect health.  As cases of glaucoma are heterogeneous, it may be inescapable that some will show one abnormal feature first and others another feature, for example disc abnormality before field abnormality, or field abnormality before disc abnormality.  The second way to diagnosis emerging glaucoma is to recognize a ‘change’ over time, perhaps while the feature being observed or measured is still ‘in the normal range.’ This principle of early diagnosis by documenting a change over time is demonstrated by the authors for disc configuration, and needs study with regard to visual fields and new technologies being developed to quantify nerve fibers. This method requires repeat examinations over some period of time, is potentially most useful for early diagnosis, and is rationale for images or quantified baseline measurements in those at high risk for developing glaucoma. 

The predictive utility of the NFI [Nerve Fiber Index] on the GDx-VCC was greatest when it was <15 (negative prediction) or >50 (positive prediction).  But even when the NFI lay between 35 and 50, the likelihood of pre-perimetric glaucoma was increased by more than eightfold compared to controls.  This paper is to be commended on several grounds. It demonstrated that GDx VCC was capable of providing useful information for clinicians who face the diagnostic challenge of an optic disc morphology suspicious for glaucoma but without a reproducible visual field defect on standard automated perimetry.

M & T Commentary:
Note that we underlined “providing useful information,” because we want to unrelentingly stress that all current diagnostic instruments do just that.  None make a diagnosis; it is  the skilled clinician who makes a diagnosis!

Progression: Predictive Factors
For patients with elevated IOP, significantly predictive factors for progression were older age, advanced perimetric damage, small neuroretinal rim, and larger area of x-zone of peripapillar atrophy. In contrast, in NPG patients, a significant predictive factor was presence of optic disc hemorrhages at baseline. 

It is noteworthy that the presence of an optic disc hemorrhage at baseline was the only parameter significantly associated with increased frequency of progression in NPG.  Thus, chronic open-angle glaucoma and NPG differ in predictive factors for eventual progression of glaucomatous optic neuropathy.

RNFL  and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome
Prior reports have suggested an association between obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) and glaucoma.  The mechanism has been thought to involve intermittent upper airway obstruction during sleep producing relative hypoxia, vascular dysregulation, and secondary ischemic optic nerve damage. 

[The study by Kargi et al.] adds further evidence that patients with OSAS may be at risk for the development of glaucomatous optic neuropathy.  The authors correctly point out that ischemia injury may represent a possible mechanism for RNFL loss.

An alternative hypothesis that may co-exist in such patients is that intermittent upper airway obstruction may produce increased intra-thoracic pressure resulting in increased episcleral venous pressure and increased nocturnal IOP.

M & T Commentary:
Also keep in mind that obese patients with OSAS are at risk for Floppy Eyelid Syndrome (and vice versa), so be attentive for symptomatic complaints of unilateral eye irritation in this subgroup of patients.

Cooperation with Medical Therapy
Olthoff ­et al.  reviewed many of the papers on cooperation with medical glaucoma therapy.  They conclude that we know the following facts:

  1. Noncompliance with prescribed therapy is common;
  2. it may be a cause of worse visual outcomes;
  3. no patient characteristics accurately identify non-compliers;
  4. patients underreport their non-compliance;
  5. monitoring ideally should use mechanical devices;
  6. pharmacy refill data are probably less accurate predictors of cooperation;
  7. educational efforts may be useful in improving compliance;
  8. compliance may be better with simpler regimens (fewer drops/day, less complex schedules of medications);
  9. patients probably comply better if they make more doctor visits.

M & T Commentary:
Regarding #5 in the above list, these are about to become available for general use.  It will be interesting  to learn just how helpful such devices can be.

Target Pressure
Malerbi et al. conducted a retrospective analysis of their clinical data of 65 patients with POAG.  Patients had four IOP measurements between 8:00 am and 5:00 pm; so these measurements are clearly not diurnal, by definition.  Not surprisingly, additional pressure measurements yielded a wider range of IOPs, some of which were above the individual’s target pressure.  The main message is that additional IOP measurements will reveal a wider range of IOP fluctuation.  It is not clear, however, how to use this finding in practice.  There is accumulating evidence that long-term IOP fluctuation is an important risk factor for glaucomatous progression.

Prostaglandins
In a well powered randomized clinical trial the addition of topical bimatoprost to latanoprost significantly raises, rather than lowers IOP. Despite [the trials] not having demonstrated a precise mechanism of why the co-administration of these two individually potent drugs should result in an elevated IOP, the message that latanoprost and bimatoprost should not be used together is still compelling.

M & T Commentary:
It is probably reasonable to assume that none of the prostaglandins should be used together, and that no prostaglandin should be used more than once daily.

Statins and Glaucoma  
Do statins prevent the development of glaucoma, as well as lower your cholesterol?  Statins not only decrease synthesis of cholesterol, but have ‘spin-off’ effects due to decreasing other molecules in the cholesterol synthesis pathway.  One such change is the cytoskeleton, causing cells to change shape.  A number of other cytoskeletal acting drugs have been studied in the eye, and many lower IOP; statins appear to be another in this category.

M & T Commentary:
The chatter about statins having a beneficial effect on IOP continues.  We await larger, longitudinal studies to determine the clinical significance, if any, of these drugs relative to glaucoma protection.

Iridotomy in Pigmentary Glaucoma
One might argue if eyes, showing already an increased IOP and a pigment dispersion, are the best candidate for iridotomy. In fact, pigment-induced TM damage has already occurred in such eyes.  The potential benefit of iridotomy is then greatly reduced. 

The issue of laser iridotomy in pigmentary glaucoma is still unresolved.  Until prospective, well designed, randomized and properly controlled clinical trials will be available, we will not be allowed to deny (or trace) any role for laser iridotomy in eyes showing a pigmentary glaucoma.  

What do we know about laser iridotomy in pigmentary glaucoma?  We know that laser iridotomy straightens the iris in patients with posterior bowing and pigment dispersion.  It is presumed this straightening reduces pigment shedding ultimately leading to better intraocular pressure (IOP) control.

In conclusion, if you are an ‘iridotomist,’ based on this paper [by Reistad et al.] there is little reason for you to stop your current practice.  However, the evidence for a clinical effect on IOP with iridotomy remains very weak and indeed is not supported by this paper.   [Commentator Graham Trope states that hex] “will continue with my practice of not performing iridotomy until such time as I see some convincing evidence from a randomized prospective study to support such intervention.”

M & T Commentary:
In patients with increasing IOP and/or progressive ONH changes over time, laser iridotomy should be considered in an effort to allow the iris diaphragm to move forward, thus halting (or minimizing) iris pigment epithelial shedding.  This could allow the mechanisms within the trabecular meshwork to reestablish more physiologic aqueous flow, and ultimately IOP reduction.  We agree that once pigmentary glaucoma is firmly established, little is accomplished by performing an LPI - the opportunity for earlier and therapeutically meaningful intervention has been missed.  

Cataract Extraction and IOP          
In this study, Issa et al. measure central anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness, and axial length in 103 non-glaucomatous eyes pre- and post-cataract surgery and try to correlate these measures with the change in intraocular pressure (IOP).  The most notable finding was the extent of reduction in IOP following surgery was inversely related to the preoperative ACD. 

The assumption can be made that it is a widening of the angle that is responsible for the relationship between shallow preoperative anterior chamber and a subsequent decrease in IOP.

Glaucoma Risk Analysis
[Study] results suggest that adjusted IOP, as calculated using current algorithms, is not useful within glaucoma risk analysis since adjusted IOP was unable to predict either presence or severity of glaucomatous visual-field loss in this study.  CCT, conversely, was found to be a robust and independent predictor of glaucomatous visual-field loss.  These findings, while supporting routine CCT measurements for all glaucoma suspects, do not support routine clinical computation of adjusted IOP values using current algorithms.   

Increased CCT may lead to falsely high values of IOP measure with Goldmann applanation tonometer.  In this study, when IOP values of the OHT group were redefined according to the formulae regarding the CCT, the authors noted that one third of them were normal.  Determination of the CCT in OHT cases is crucial since it has great impact on IOP values, measured with applanation tonometer, which is the main parameter in the diagnosis and follow-up of glaucoma.

M & T Commentary:
It is the stand-alone CCT that helps enable risk quantification in the context of glaucoma.  Attempting to use CCT to yield a CCT-adjusted IOP appears to be minimally useful.  Thin corneas are at greater risk for glaucoma that thick corneas.  Thick corneas cause inflated IOP readings, which may lead inattentive (or naïve) doctors to initiate unnecessary ocular hypertensive therapy. Always cerebrally analyze all the data obtained during the course of a comprehensive glaucoma evaluation, and do not let one isolated factor inappropriately sway your judgment.

IOP Measurements in the Management of Glaucoma  
Day-long measurements are useful in selected patients who demonstrate progressive glaucomatous damage. Early morning measurements are most frequently highest. The range of IOP may be as important, or more important than, the peak IOP level.

Any single intraocular pressure measurement taken between 7 am and 9 pm has a higher than 75% chance to miss the highest point of a diurnal curve.  Intraocular pressures may be measured at different times of the day to have the best chance of observing the maximal value.

Goldmann applanation tonometers are not as accurate as the manufacturer’s recommended calibration error tolerance of ± 0.5mmHg would suggest.  Calibration error of less than .5mmHg is clinically acceptable. Calibration error checks should be carried out once monthly and tonometers with calibration errors greater than ± 2.5mmHg returned to the manufacturer for recalibration.  Additional checks should be made if tonometers suffer specific damage. 

M & T Commentary:
Let’s beat this dead horse one more time.  When at all practical (which is at least 90% of the time), obtain three to four IOP measurements prior to initiating ocular hypertensive therapy.  This will enable a more complete characterization of the diurnal curve, which can then more effectively guide therapeutic intervention.

Threshold Testing
In a hospital eye service glaucoma clinic in which new referrals are evaluated, threshold 24-2 FDT testing with the Humphrey Matrix has performance characteristics similar to [standard automated perimetry.]  These findings suggest threshold testing using the FDT Matrix and SAP is comparable when the 24-2 test pattern is used.

M & T Commentary:
While this has also  been our experience, it is important to note that the frequency doubling targets used in the Matrix probably allow detection of visual field defects 3 to 5 years earlier than standard perimetry.  The implication of such in patient care is yet to be determined.    

Systemic Hypertension and Glaucoma
Common pathogenic mechanisms in ciliary and renal tubular epithelia may explain coincidence of glaucoma and systemic hypertension.  The choice of cardiovascular treatment, could substantially influence glaucoma incidence, with beta blockade protecting and ACE inhibitors of calcium channel blockers not affecting underlying risk.

Brinzolamide Versus Dorzolamide as Adjunctive Therapy
[This study] concluded that the efficacy of brinzolamide 1% was equivalent to dorzolamide 1%; however, the safety of brinzolamide 1% was superior to dorzolamide as adjunctive therapy to the combination with latanoprost and a beta-blocker.

Neuroprotection
Although it is known that ganglion cell death causes loss of vision in glaucoma, the pathogenesis of the disease is complex, probably involving an initial ischemic insult to the ganglion cell axons and glial cells with the ganglion cell bodies eventually being affected.  It may therefore be necessary to blunt many stages in the pathogenesis of the disease to obtain a clinically effective neuroprotective strategy.  In animal experiments, one cause of ganglion cell death in ischemia is an overactivation of glutamate receptors and a subsequent rise in intracellular levels of sodium and calcium ions as well as a generation of reactive oxygen species.  In contrast, optic nerve death in ischemia is mainly caused by an influx of sodium and reversal of the sodium/calcium exchanger, which leads to a rise in intracellular calcium.  Thus, a substance that reduces the influx of sodium will protect the ganglion cell axon, and if it also reduces calcium influx and/or acts as an antioxidant, it will protect the ganglion cell body in addition.  Of all antiglaucoma drugs, only beta-blockers have both calcium and sodium channel blocking activity, with betaxolol being the most efficacious of those analyzed.  In addition, of the tested ophthalmic beta-blockers only metipranolol has powerful antioxidant properties.  Moreover, laboratory studies on rats have shown that topically applied beta-blockers attenuate ischemic injury to ganglion cells by mechanisms that do not appear to involve an action on beta-receptors.  Thus, of the substances used to lower intraocular pressure in glaucoma, beta-blockers have unique additional characteristics that also give them the capacity to act as neuroprotectants.

M & T Commentary:
Very interesting.  We’re not sure what to make of this, other than to see if further studies show a clinically significant effect.  Who knows? Beta-blockers may play an even stronger role in glaucoma care in years to come.

Does Adjunctive Glaucoma Therapy Affect Adherence to the Primary Therapy?
[The study concludes thatx] the statistically and clinically significant increase in refill intervals may affect intraocular pressure control.  The authors suggest that, when adding a second drug, physicians need to consider the possible impact on the patient’s adherence to the first drug.

The Importance of Complete Medication Documentation by General Physicians 
[In this study] almost  half of the charts of these primary physicians had no documentation of any eyedrop use by their patients with glaucoma.  An important step in reducing drug-induced side effects and interactions with other medications would be better recognition by primary physicians of the ophthalmic drugs used by their patients.

END

ftr