EyeUpdate Home
Contact Us Sitemap hdr
hdr2 hdr3 hdr5
Clinical Pearls Case Studies Seminars / Lectures Books Links
sub1

 





sub2 sub3

An Up-date on the GDx-VCC


Reference:
Reus , NJ and Lemij, HG, “Diagnostic Accuracy of the GDx-VCC for Glaucoma”, Ophthalmology, October, 2004.

Select Quotes:     
“We found that GDx-VCC parameters discriminate well between healthy and glaucomatous eyes.  The Nerve Fiber Index (NFI) seemed to be the best parameter in classifying glaucoma.”  However, “x judgment of the printout as a whole resulted in a better separation between normal and glaucomatous eyes than judgment of single parameters.  We therefore expect that an assessment of the entire printout will further improve the high accuracy of the GDx VCC.”

“x, an NFI value > 44 occurs over 60 times more often in glaucoma patients than in healthy subjects.  These data suggest that glaucoma subjects rarely have an NFI of < 35 and healthy subjects will almost never have an NFI of > 44.”

M & T Commentary
While the NFI value appears to be the single most predictive parameter on the printout, the astute clinician will study the entire printout to glean every morsel of information to maximally enhance diagnostic value.

Obviously, the higher the NFI the more predictive of glaucoma, and the lower the NFI the better, however this study provides a more exacting quantification.  Basically, if the NFI is 44 or greater, it is indicative of glaucoma, and conversely, if the NFI is 35 or less, it is indicative of normal.  Values between 35 and 44 yield a neutral effect, and the GDx-VCC data is non conclusive, meaning the doctor will have to lean more heavily on the balance of the comprehensive diagnostic glaucoma evaluation for clinical decision making.

The authors conclude: “xthe GDx-VCC features ease of administration, short testing, and processing time, and ease of interpretation of results.”  We agree.

ftr