EyeUpdate Home
Contact Us Sitemap hdr
hdr2 hdr3 hdr5
Clinical Pearls Case Studies Seminars / Lectures Books Links
sub1

 





sub2 sub3

A Fresh Look at "Sulfa Allergy"
July 2004. 


There has long been a history of concern over placing patients with “sulfa allergy” on sulfa-based drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors used in the management of both open- and closed-angle glaucoma, as well as pseudotumor cerebri. 

Acetalzolamide (Diamox), methazolamide (Neptazane), brinzolamide (Azopt) and dorzolamide (Trusopt) are commonly used in eye care.

“Acetalzolamide is a mainstay in the medical treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (pseudotumor cerebri).  It is a nonbacterial sulfonamide with a chemical structure and pharmacological activity that is different from the sulfonamide antimicrobials.”

“The unfortunate lay term ‘sulfa allergy’ has been used to describe any allergic or pseudoallergic reaction to sulfonamides, but clinically it usually (if not exclusively) refers to a reaction to sulfonamide antibiotics.”

“A detailed medical history, documentation of the type of adverse reaction, adequate patient counseling regarding the low but theoretical risk of cross-reaction, and appropriate informed consent are recommended for these patients.”

Reference:
Lee, A. G., et. al.  “Presumed ‘Sulfa-allergy’ in Patients with Intracranial Hypertension Treated with Acetalzolamide or Furosemide:  Cross-reactivity, Myth or Reality?”. AJO, July, 2004

An abstract appearing in the July, 2004 AJO on this same topic concluded:  “This study shows that although there is an association between hypersensitivity after receipt of sulfonamide antibiotics and a subsequent reaction after the receipt of a sulfonamide nonantibiotic, the association appears to be due to a predisposition to allergic reactions rather than to cross-reactivity with sulfonamide drugs.”

Reference:
Storm, B. L., et. al.   “Absence of Cross-reactivity Between Sulfonamide Antibiotics and Sulfonamide Nonantibiotics.”  English Journal of Medicine, 2003; 349: 1635-1638.

M & T Commentary
In treating patients with acute angle closure glaucoma, or iatrogenically-induced bilateral simultaneous angle closure (such as with Topamax), we have long held that patient with a history of sulfa-allergy not be treated with acetalzolamide (Diamox), but rather with glycerin (Osmoglyn).  This guidance may be overly cautious in light of the new findings set forth in these articles.  For non-diabetic patients, this advice may well continue to be the rational, albeit, conservative approach.  However, for those less common patients with diabetes and a history of sulfa-allergy, they might very well be better served with acetalzolamide rather than glycerin (Osmoglyn) since the latter packs a high calorie load which could exacerbate their diabetes - even if only for a day or two.   It seems that the most critical factor in such decision-making would be the degree of severity of the purported initial allergic reaction.  This same consideration should be valid when pondering the use of a topical CAI glaucoma eyedrop, such as brinzolamide or dorzolamide.

We are now more comfortable with the notion of using any of the CAIs in patient giving a “soft” history of sulfa-allergy.     

ftr